Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AMF plus soil yeast inoculation significantly increased yield and its components.

A claim from TREATMENT OF SNAP BEAN PLANTS GROWN UNDER SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS WITH SOME NATURAL MATERIALS AND ITS RELATION TO GROWTH, YIELD AND POD QUALITY · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus soil yeast inoculation significantly increased yield and its components.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
snap bean seeds inoculation with AMF plus application with soil yeaste0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
soil yeaste0symbiont
Outcome
yield and it's componentse0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“significant increases in vegetative growth characters, photosynthetic pigments, yield and it's components as well as some chemical constituents of pods as aresult of snap bean seeds inoculation with AMF plus application with soil yeast around root zone by using hand sprayer as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1140

Title

TREATMENT OF SNAP BEAN PLANTS GROWN UNDER SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS WITH SOME NATURAL MATERIALS AND ITS RELATION TO GROWTH, YIELD AND POD QUALITY

Hala El-Sayed; M. Zaghloul; K. Nour; et al. Journal of Plant Production 2015. doi:10.21608/jpp.2015.49336

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-7fd07dcb19cf4e630766a538053fdf24cfd217cc754b9c025f1dbe7f3b3bb1a0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.