Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sunnhemp green manuring increased tobacco leaf yields and grade index compared with other treatments.

A claim from Effect of application of biofertilizers to soybean (Glycine max) and nitrogen to tobacco (Nicotiuna tabacum) in soybean - tobacco cropping system · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunnhemp green manuring increased tobacco leaf yields and grade index compared with other treatments.

Treatment
Green-manuring in situ with sunnhempe0
Outcome
tobacco green-leaf and cured-leaf yields, and grade indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treat- mentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green-manuring in situ with sunnhemp [Crotalaria juncea (L.) Rotar & Joy] followed by tobacco recorded significantly higher tobacco green-leaf and cured-leaf yields, and grade index compared with other treat- ments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–794

Title

Effect of application of biofertilizers to soybean (Glycine max) and nitrogen to tobacco (Nicotiuna tabacum) in soybean - tobacco cropping system

S.V. KRISHNA REDDY; S. KASTURI KRISHNA; J.A.V. PRASAD RAO; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v52i4.4942

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-80bc2c46f3f4b9837c31071f35ab1182a01d28313c6f1a54b6af73b445bedb49 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Crotalaria juncea · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 187 positive, 27 negative or no effect

186 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

205 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.