Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Light water deficit increased broad bean yield by 14.05% compared with control.

A claim from The Water Consumption and Yield Effect Under Regulated Deficit Irrigation of Spring Broad Bean · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light water deficit increased broad bean yield by 14.05% compared with control.

Taxon
Broad BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Light water deficite7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
14.05%e7
Comparator
CKe7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Light water deficit had increased yield 9.09% and 14.05% but high water deficit decreased yield 1.65% and 7.44% compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1147
t0

“The Water Consumption and Yield Effect Under Regulated Deficit Irrigation of Spring Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94

Title

The Water Consumption and Yield Effect Under Regulated Deficit Irrigation of Spring Broad Bean

Wang Fu-xia Shuitu baochi yanjiu 2008

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-80cd50c911ae0d269504ca19df6e2652bb7db1e04b3d881db7748546c2961340 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

drought · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

40 papers: 7 positive, 33 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

light · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.