Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High water deficit decreased broad bean yield by 1.65% compared with control.

A claim from The Water Consumption and Yield Effect Under Regulated Deficit Irrigation of Spring Broad Bean · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High water deficit decreased broad bean yield by 1.65% compared with control.

Taxon
Broad BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
high water deficite7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
1.65%e7
Comparator
CKe7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Light water deficit had increased yield 9.09% and 14.05% but high water deficit decreased yield 1.65% and 7.44% compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1147
t0

“The Water Consumption and Yield Effect Under Regulated Deficit Irrigation of Spring Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94

Title

The Water Consumption and Yield Effect Under Regulated Deficit Irrigation of Spring Broad Bean

Wang Fu-xia Shuitu baochi yanjiu 2008

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-d6ffd6e6a6d84d3d1887ca455cfc44a8a4933520342fc69e9c6a95adc2709f90 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer

drought · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

40 papers: 7 positive, 33 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.