Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Paenibacillus inoculation promoted cowpea growth.

A claim from Triple inoculation with Bradyrhizobium, Glomus and Paenibacillus on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] walp.) development · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paenibacillus inoculation promoted cowpea growth.

Treatment
Inoculation with P. brasilensis - 24e0
Interactor
P. brasilensis - 24Paenibacillus brasilensise0symbiont
Outcome
cowpea growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with P. brasilensis - 24 increased colonization by Bradyrhizobium sp. and G. etunicatum and promoted cowpea growth, while the nitrogen from symbiosis was sufficient to supply the plants nutritional needs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1267

Title

Triple inoculation with Bradyrhizobium, Glomus and Paenibacillus on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] walp.) development

André Suêldo Tavares de Lima; Terezinha Ferreira Xavier; Cláudia Elizabete Pereira de Lima; et al. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2011. doi:10.1590/s1517-83822011000300010

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-8451da03aa98f35cc2c7c62730c3b0d664a6ca8347fae3e7570809c1dc185de8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Paenibacillus brasilensis · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.