Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bradyrhizobium and Glomus inoculation favored cowpea nitrogen acquisition.

A claim from Triple inoculation with Bradyrhizobium, Glomus and Paenibacillus on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] walp.) development · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium and Glomus inoculation favored cowpea nitrogen acquisition.

Treatment
Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. (BR 3267 and EI - 6) and G. etunicatume0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium sp.Bradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
G. etunicatume0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen acquisitione0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. (BR 3267 and EI - 6) and G. etunicatum favored nitrogen acquisition and phosphorus availability for the cowpea plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1050

Title

Triple inoculation with Bradyrhizobium, Glomus and Paenibacillus on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] walp.) development

André Suêldo Tavares de Lima; Terezinha Ferreira Xavier; Cláudia Elizabete Pereira de Lima; et al. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2011. doi:10.1590/s1517-83822011000300010

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-30c0ea414e1b5a32432cfc5e312df3d5ec71d1bd8e847ead4744a3c99475651f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

brassinolide · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bradyrhizobium · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 41 positive, 2 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.