Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar seaweed extract and iron and zinc increased peach seedling height, diameter and branch number versus water control.

A claim from Effect of foliar spraying of seaweed extract and with iron and zinc chelated on thegrowth and nutritional status of Nemaguard peach rootstock seedlings · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar seaweed extract and iron and zinc increased peach seedling height, diameter and branch number versus water control.

Material
Nemaguardt0
Treatment
foliar spraying seaweed extract and some micronutrients (iron and zinc chelated)e0
Interactor
seaweede0other
Outcome
seedling height, seedling diameter, number of branches/seedlingse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to the control, the results showed that foliar spraying seaweed extract and some micronutrients (iron and zinc chelated) increased all characteristics of vegetative growth significantly, including seedling height, seedling diameter, number of branches/seedlings, number of leaves/seedlings, leaf area (cm 2 ), total chlorophylls, and fresh and dry weight of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–1109
t0

“Nemaguard peach rootstock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151

Title

Effect of foliar spraying of seaweed extract and with iron and zinc chelated on thegrowth and nutritional status of Nemaguard peach rootstock seedlings

Amal Rakha; Abou Rayya; Nabila Kaseem; et al. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences 2024. doi:10.36632/mejas/2024.14.3.32

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-88638432a23bcae01213f28c7c30059b4b776cb2a0611688db8fa852c0cf47eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron atom · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.