Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ZmNAC1 expression was induced by ABA.

A claim from Cloning and characterization of a transcription factor ZmNAC1 in maize (Zea mays) · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZmNAC1 expression was induced by ABA.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ABAe0
Gene
ZmNAC1e0
Outcome
expression of ZmNAC1e0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the expression of ZmNAC1 was induced by low temperature, PEG, salt, and ABA, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–761
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70

Title

Cloning and characterization of a transcription factor ZmNAC1 in maize (Zea mays)

Zhan-Ji LIU; Feng-Xia SHAO; Gui-Ying TANG; et al. Hereditas (Beijing) 2009. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1005.2009.00199

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-8a9ce9fbd44df05c7395e2884de29529747861d75a44e7eb70701c5fd93dd714 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

(+)-abscisic acid · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    ABA at 100 muM led to a complete, possibly non-specific repression of all detected ZmPIP and ZmTIP genes after 24 h in maize.

    Differential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Exogenously applied ABA did not affect Cat3 transcript levels in excised maize embryos.

    Differential response of maize catalases to abscisic acid: Vp1 transcriptional activator is not required for abscisic acid-regulated Cat1 expression. · 1992

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Exogenous ABA did not influence the expression of maize gene ZmRD22A.

    Drought and exogenous abscisic acid alter hydrogen peroxide accumulation and differentially regulate the expression of two maize RD22-like genes · 2017

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    ABA had an effect on cyclin D2 expression no different from controls.

    Maize Cyclin D2 Expression, Associated Kinase Activity and Effect of Phytohormones During Germination · 2005 · compared with controls

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    ABA did not induce ZmDREB2A expression.

    Promoter‐associated histone acetylation is involved in the osmotic stress‐induced transcriptional regulation of the maize ZmDREB2A gene · 2013

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Exogenous ABA repressed HAT and HDAC expression.

    ABA treatment of germinating maize seeds induces VP1 gene expression and selective promoter‐associated histone acetylation · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    ABA had no observed effect on ZmTIP2-3 transcripts.

    Characterization in maize of ZmTIP2-3, a root-specific tonoplast intrinsic protein exhibiting aquaporin activity · 2003

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Imbibition with abscisic acid (ABA) did not alter the pattern of PCNA expression in maize seed germination compared with control seeds.

    Proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in maize seed development and germination: Regulation by phytohormones and its association with putative cell cycle proteins · 2000 · compared with control seeds

    Opposite direction

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.