Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by sulfosulfuron gave the maximum net monetary return, Rs 36250.

A claim from Efficacy of pre and post-emergence herbicides on growth and yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Doon Valley of Uttarakhand · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by sulfosulfuron gave the maximum net monetary return, Rs 36250.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
pendimethalin fb Sulfosulfuron @ 1 + 0.018 kg a.i.ha-1 P.E at 2 DAS and PoE at 30 DASe3
Outcome
net monetary returne4
Direction
maximume4
Value
Rs 36250e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–97
e3

“The treatment pendimethalin fb Sulfosulfuron @ 1 + 0.018 kg a.i.ha-1 P.E at 2 DAS and PoE at 30 DAS (T6) recorded greater yield attributes and seed and Stover yield (2540 kg/ha and 2668 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1083
e4

“maximum net monetary return (Rs 36250) and Benefit: Cost ratio and 1.86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1159

Title

Efficacy of pre and post-emergence herbicides on growth and yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Doon Valley of Uttarakhand

Sanket Prabhakar Pokharkar; Pratap Jambuvant Khose; Prashant Balashaheb Shinde International Journal of Agricultural and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.52804/ijaas2020.1220

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-8c034cf74d2cfdcdf582a73d15285d46a4e6b580b0da2cf0f5900ebef85f8d59 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.