Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The disc type furrow opener no-till seeder achieved better stubble distribution on the soil surface, seed distribution and percentage of seed emergence of winter wheat than narrow hoe and chisel type openers.

A claim from Peformances of various furrow openers, covering components, and forward speeds of no-till seeders for sowing of winter wheat · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disc type furrow opener no-till seeder achieved better stubble distribution on the soil surface, seed distribution and percentage of seed emergence of winter wheat than narrow hoe and chisel type openers.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
disc type furrow openere1
Outcome
stubble distribution on the soil surface, seed distribution, and percentage of seed emergencee1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
narrow hoe and chisel type openerse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–124
e1

“The no-till seeder with a disc type furrow opener achieved better stubble distribution on the soil surface, seed distribution, and percentage of seed emergence in comparison to no-till seeders with narrow hoe and chisel type openers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1318

Title

Peformances of various furrow openers, covering components, and forward speeds of no-till seeders for sowing of winter wheat

ÇELİK, Ahmet; ALTIKAT, Sefa DergiPark (Istanbul University) 2013

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-8c1b4c0d7d2a76551908760db4e0e610454c7940fb3f4f9df99faea6a0b2da1a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.