Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Onion bulb diameter did not differ significantly among treatments.

A claim from Evaluation of Natural Rock Powder as a Potassium Source for Onion (Allium cepa L.) Cultivation · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion bulb diameter did not differ significantly among treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
natural rock powder (NRP)e1
Outcome
bulb diametere0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
mineral fertilizer controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences in onion fresh weight or bulb diameter across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–486
e1

“natural rock powder (NRP), derived from potassium (K) feldspar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–116
e2

“a mineral fertilizer control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–282

Title

Evaluation of Natural Rock Powder as a Potassium Source for Onion (Allium cepa L.) Cultivation

Jinhwan Park; Taehee Baek; Namhee Yi; et al. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 2026. doi:10.7745/kjssf.2026.59.2.198

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-8ca3fa5a09776da2205d957bdc75a555e00e99384c912bf40367b12417ef8a8e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

botanical · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.