Paper · 2026 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Evaluation of Natural Rock Powder as a Potassium Source for Onion (Allium cepa L.) Cultivation

Jinhwan Park; Taehee Baek; Namhee Yi; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the potential of natural rock powder (NRP), derived from potassium (K) feldspar, as an eco-friendly K fertilizer for onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivation under vinyl mulching conditions.The experimental design included a mineral fertilizer control and various NRP treatments (standard rate, double rate, micro-particles, and foliar application).The results showed no significant differences in onion fresh weight or bulb diameter across all treatments, suggesting that NRP can support basic crop growth.However, the K content in plant tissues was lower in NRP-treated plots compared to the control, with significant reductions observed in the NRP-2 and NRP-MP groups.This lower K uptake is attributed to the low solubility of NRP and its tendency to remain on the mulch surface during top-dressing, which limits nutrient penetration into the soil.Lab-scale elution tests confirmed that the control released approximately twice as much cumulative K as the NRP treatments, although Si release was comparable due to the mineral composition of the raw material.While NRP shows promise as a sustainable K source, enhancing its solubility through formulation improvements or specialized application methods is essential to optimize its efficacy in plastic-mulched cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion fresh weight did not differ significantly among fertilizer treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
natural rock powder (NRP)e1
Outcome
onion fresh weighte0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
mineral fertilizer controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences in onion fresh weight or bulb diameter across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“natural rock powder (NRP), derived from potassium (K) feldspar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–116 · show in text ↑
e2

“a mineral fertilizer control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion bulb diameter did not differ significantly among treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
natural rock powder (NRP)e1
Outcome
bulb diametere0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
mineral fertilizer controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences in onion fresh weight or bulb diameter across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“natural rock powder (NRP), derived from potassium (K) feldspar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–116 · show in text ↑
e2

“a mineral fertilizer control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant tissue K content was lower with NRP than with mineral fertilizer.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepae1
Treatment
NRP-treated plotse0
Outcome
K content in plant tissuese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the K content in plant tissues was lower in NRP-treated plots compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NRP-2 significantly reduced plant tissue K content relative to control.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepae1
Treatment
NRP-2e0
Outcome
K content in plant tissuese0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the K content in plant tissues was lower in NRP-treated plots compared to the control, with significant reductions observed in the NRP-2 and NRP-MP groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–701 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NRP-MP significantly reduced plant tissue K content relative to control.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepae1
Treatment
NRP-MPe0
Outcome
K content in plant tissuese0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the K content in plant tissues was lower in NRP-treated plots compared to the control, with significant reductions observed in the NRP-2 and NRP-MP groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–701 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–176 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower K uptake was attributed to low NRP solubility and retention on mulch during top dressing.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepae1
Outcome
lower K uptakee0
Qualifier
low solubility of NRP and its tendency to remain on the mulch surface during top-dressinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This lower K uptake is attributed to the low solubility of NRP and its tendency to remain on the mulch surface during top-dressing, which limits nutrient penetration into the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–882 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–176 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer released about twice the cumulative K of NRP in laboratory elution tests.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepae1
Outcome
cumulative Ke0
Value
approximately twicee0
Comparator
NRP treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lab-scale elution tests confirmed that the control released approximately twice as much cumulative K as the NRP treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–176 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si release from the control and NRP treatments was comparable in elution tests.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepae2
Outcome
Si releasee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
NRP treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although Si release was comparable due to the mineral composition of the raw material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control released approximately twice as much cumulative K as the NRP treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1004 · show in text ↑
e2

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–176 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend improving NRP solubility or application methods for plastic-mulched crops.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepae1
Outcome
enhancing its solubility through formulation improvements or specialized application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing its solubility through formulation improvements or specialized application methods is essential to optimize its efficacy in plastic-mulched cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1309 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–176 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

botanical · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 37 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.