Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 100% organic nutrient source treatment gave maximum onion yield.

A claim from EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON ONION YIELD AND SOIL PROPERTIES IN SOYBEAN - ONION CROPPING SEQUENCE · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% organic nutrient source treatment gave maximum onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% organic nutrient source through FYM, vermicompost, neem seed cake, Azotobacter, PSB and trap crope0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yield of onione0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100% organic nutrient source through FYM, vermicompost, neem seed cake, Azotobacter, PSB and trap crop gave the maximum yield of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1589

Title

EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON ONION YIELD AND SOIL PROPERTIES IN SOYBEAN - ONION CROPPING SEQUENCE

Vu Tien Khang; H. M. Patil; Viet Nam 2011

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-4d5ddbcbce4f7a022b1405ef8981c8c21a09ad634c05922ca334f700d952ff63 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.