Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dry periods of up to 78 h immediately after inoculation did not reduce olive scab incidence.

A claim from Factors Affecting Infection and Disease Development on Olive Leaves Inoculated with Fusicladium oleagineum · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry periods of up to 78 h immediately after inoculation did not reduce olive scab incidence.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Picuale0
Treatment
Dry periods ≤78 h immediately after inoculatione2
Interactor
Fusicladium oleagineume0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee2
Direction
did not reducee2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive scab disease, caused by Fusicladium oleagineum, were evaluated on detached leaves and potted plants of the susceptible cultivar Picual in growth chambers and a shadehouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–205
e2

“Dry periods ≤78 h immediately after inoculation did not reduce disease incidence but did reduce disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–747

Title

Factors Affecting Infection and Disease Development on Olive Leaves Inoculated with Fusicladium oleagineum

José R. Viruega; Luis F. Roca; Juan Moral; et al. Plant Disease 2011. doi:10.1094/pdis-02-11-0126

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-8ca989e1fbc5d5e4c068b4318b297cb0d18f7cafbdce63e705a720fb93aae34f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

inoculation · disease · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 7 positive, 10 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.