Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plant biomass nitrogen inputs were greater with vetch and vetch plus rye than rye or weeds.

A claim from Nitrogen Storage with Cover Crops and Nitrogen Fertilization in Tilled and Nontilled Soils · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant biomass nitrogen inputs were greater with vetch and vetch plus rye than rye or weeds.

Treatment
vetch and vetch + rye with N ratese0
Outcome
Nitrogen inputs in above‐ and belowground plant biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
rye and weeds with or without Ne0
Setting
tilled and nontilled soilse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen inputs in above‐ and belowground plant biomass varied with the season and were greater in vetch and vetch + rye with N rates than in rye and weeds with or without N in tilled and nontilled soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1014
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) and sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–358

Title

Nitrogen Storage with Cover Crops and Nitrogen Fertilization in Tilled and Nontilled Soils

Upendra M. Sainju; Bharat P. Singh Agronomy Journal 2008. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0236

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8e5e7caa5404e49066a0f8defc6078cee8aeefba548b2ef0d82e555582c46379 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.