Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat on bed with radish in furrow gave the maximum wheat equivalent yield (92.46 q/ha) among the intercrops.

A claim from FIRB Intercropping of Vegetables and Seed Spices with Wheat for Higher Productivity and Profitability of Small and Marginal Farmers · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat on bed with radish in furrow gave the maximum wheat equivalent yield (92.46 q/ha) among the intercrops.

Treatment
wheat on bed +radish in furrowe2
Outcome
wheat equivalent yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
92.46 q/hae2
Comparator
intercropse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–175
e2

“Among the intercrops, wheat on bed +radish in furrow produced maximum wheat equivalent yield (92.46 q/ha), which was 36.37 % higher than sole wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–610

Title

FIRB Intercropping of Vegetables and Seed Spices with Wheat for Higher Productivity and Profitability of Small and Marginal Farmers

Subhash Chandra Tripathi; Subhash Chander; Raj Pal Meena Journal of Cereal Research 2018. doi:10.25174/2249-4065/2017/73366

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8e881150da329dd3a4f51906e3a5c3785e64a89621e7f41eea27bebeedaef4eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.