Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bentazon did not alter thifensulfuron efficacy in the weeds.

A claim from Physiological response of soybean (Glycine max) and two weed species to thifensulfuron and bentazon combinations · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon did not alter thifensulfuron efficacy in the weeds.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
420 g ai bentazon ha −-1e0
Outcome
thifensulfuron efficacye0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
thifensulfurone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 420 g ai bentazon ha −-1 had no effect on thifensulfuron efficacy in the weed species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–616
t0

“soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–47

Title

Physiological response of soybean (Glycine max) and two weed species to thifensulfuron and bentazon combinations

Darren W. Lycan; Stephen E. Hart Weed Science 1999. doi:10.1017/s0043174500091542

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-8ec49d45b7ea0d73d1c1065d36f7ead93cf9fd4b1a3f16341de772c992d24069 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

bentazone · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.