Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Organic fertilizer raised mung bean leaf area index by 27.43%–28.72%.

A claim from Optimization of water and fertilizer management on the intercropping system between maize and mung bean to improve photosynthetic characteristics & water use and to increase plant yield · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer raised mung bean leaf area index by 27.43%–28.72%.

Taxon
mung beansVigna radiatae0
Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.43% - 28.72%e0
Comparator
treatment without organic fertilizere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the treatment without organic fertilizer, the leaf area index of maize and mung beans increased by 5.99% - 36.70% and 27.43% - 28.72% respectively, and the chlorophyll relative content increased by 2.31% - 3.47% and 4.59% - 4.63% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1011

Title

Optimization of water and fertilizer management on the intercropping system between maize and mung bean to improve photosynthetic characteristics & water use and to increase plant yield

Mengfan Gao; Xinxin Wang; Renqiang Chen; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2025. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1597198

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-8f8fcdc1204f17cb499b29799e8f79e66e946afeb8cd7588d5f0e254b7dd20ce · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.