Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Electrostatic spray used one half to one third the insecticide quantity of conventional methods.

A claim from Electrostatic Application of Low-volume Microbial Insecticide Spray on Broccoli Plants1 · 1980

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrostatic spray used one half to one third the insecticide quantity of conventional methods.

Treatment
electrostatic spray depositione1
Outcome
quantity of insecticidee0
Direction
½ to 1/3e0
Value
½ to 1/3e0
Comparator
conventional methodse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in equal or greater control in comparison to conventional methods, and utilized ½ to 1/3 the quantity of insecticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–261
t0

“Broccoli Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86
e1

“electrostatic spray deposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–46

Title

Electrostatic Application of Low-volume Microbial Insecticide Spray on Broccoli Plants1

S. Edward Law; Harry A. Mills Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1980. doi:10.21273/jashs.105.6.774

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-8fc7a64ce0c1919f1d263f849efe56a1f84b98ae6f0897f13490f8d961d50b9e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

application · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.