Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculation without hedgerow prunings gave the lowest inoculated yield but higher yield than uninoculated sole cropping.

A claim from Influence of mycorrhizal inoculation and different pruning regimes on fresh root yield of alley and sole cropped cassava (manihot esculentacrantz) in Nigeria · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation without hedgerow prunings gave the lowest inoculated yield but higher yield than uninoculated sole cropping.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculation without the hedgerow pruningse0
Outcome
fresh root yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole without mycorrhizal inoculatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculation without the hedgerow prunings recorded the lowest fresh root yield but was still higher than the fresh root yield from the sole without mycorrhizal inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1202
e1

“cassava (Manihot esculenta crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102

Title

Influence of mycorrhizal inoculation and different pruning regimes on fresh root yield of alley and sole cropped cassava (manihot esculentacrantz) in Nigeria

A Olusola Salami; Oluwole Osonubi Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2003. doi:10.1080/0365034031000148390

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-901a355f9bf5d239cc0d0f42bab4be9f8b98ee6221265ade5f3b74a705bedb93 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

26 papers: 13 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.