Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Across 19 years, long term no tillage sorghum yielded 58% more than short term no tillage.

A claim from Tillage Intensity in a Long-Term Wheat-Sorghum-Fallow Rotation · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across 19 years, long term no tillage sorghum yielded 58% more than short term no tillage.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
long-term NTe0
Outcome
sorghum yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
58%e0
Qualifier
79 vs. 50 bu/ae0
Comparator
short-term NTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Averaged across the past 19 years, sorghum yields with long-term NT have been 58% greater than with short-term NT (79 vs. 50 bu/a).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1282
t0

“Wheat-Sorghum-Fallow Rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62
t1

“Wheat-Sorghum-Fallow Rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62

Title

Tillage Intensity in a Long-Term Wheat-Sorghum-Fallow Rotation

A. Schlegel; A. Burnett Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 2020. doi:10.4148/2378-5977.7955

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-903a7bb3c09696eaee78c4121b2d10d76c52b1ac8abcc01b320a5847a092b0a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.