Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125% RDNK in 5 splits recorded the maximum nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency in rice.

A claim from Nutrient and Water use Efficiency, Nutrient Uptake and Rice Yield as Influenced by Fertigation Levels and Weed Management Practices · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125% RDNK in 5 splits recorded the maximum nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency in rice.

Treatment
125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splitse1
Outcome
nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiencye1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splits recorded maximum Gross Monetary returns (₹120353 ha-1), Net Monetary Returns (₹72924) and B:C ratio (2.54), nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1550
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59

Title

Nutrient and Water use Efficiency, Nutrient Uptake and Rice Yield as Influenced by Fertigation Levels and Weed Management Practices

S. U. Kakade; Abhisek Banik; O. S. Rakhonde International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2023. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183258

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-9090efd9d5f3d68e4ca30a908059db662de5545927b60852b9197df6f862620f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

fertilization · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 57 positive, 5 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.