Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Nutrient and Water use Efficiency, Nutrient Uptake and Rice Yield as Influenced by Fertigation Levels and Weed Management Practices

S. U. Kakade; Abhisek Banik; O. S. Rakhonde

14
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at AICRP on Weed Management Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during kharif 2020-21. Fertigation is the technique of supplying dissolved fertilizers to crops through an irrigation system.The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications and twenty treatment combinations having four different fertigation levels and five weed management practices. The results revealed that, significantly maximum grain yield of rice (5103 kgha-1), straw yield (7268 kgha-1) and harvest index (41.25%) were found maximum at 125% RDNK level of fertigation in 5 splits than lower fertigation levels (75 and 100 per cent) and over conventional soil application of 100 per cent RDF. Nutrient use efficiency (NUE) was found better in lower drip fertigation level of75 per cent recommended dose of N and K per ha as compared to conventional soil application of fertilizers. Among the herbicides, directed spray of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl @ 0.615 a.i. kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium @ 0.025 a.i kgha-1 at 25 DAS resulted in maximum rice grain yield (5231 kgha-1) and also total nutrient uptake by crop and water use efficiency indicating the feasibility of using herbicides for effective weed management in rice and for enhancing NUE and WUE. The 125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splits recorded maximum Gross Monetary returns (₹120353 ha-1), Net Monetary Returns (₹72924) and B:C ratio (2.54), nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency.The herbicidal treatment of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl0.615 kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium 0.025 kgha-1 at 25 DAS registered maximum GMR (₹128755 ha-1), NMR (₹81412ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.72) among all herbicidal treatments, indicating the feasibility of using herbicides for effective weed management in rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of rice was significantly highest, 5103 kg/ha, at 125% RDNK fertigation in 5 splits compared with lower fertigation levels and conventional soil application of 100% RDF.

Treatment
125% RDNK level of fertigation in 5 splitse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
5103 kgha-1e1
Qualifier
lower fertigation levels (75 and 100 per cent)e1
Comparator
conventional soil application of 100 per cent RDFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly maximum grain yield of rice (5103 kgha-1), straw yield (7268 kgha-1) and harvest index (41.25%) were found maximum at 125% RDNK level of fertigation in 5 splits than lower fertigation levels (75 and 100 per cent) and over conventional soil application of 100 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield of rice was significantly highest, 7268 kg/ha, at 125% RDNK fertigation in 5 splits compared with lower fertigation levels and conventional soil application of 100% RDF.

Treatment
125% RDNK level of fertigation in 5 splitse1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
7268 kgha-1e1
Qualifier
lower fertigation levels (75 and 100 per cent)e1
Comparator
conventional soil application of 100 per cent RDFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly maximum grain yield of rice (5103 kgha-1), straw yield (7268 kgha-1) and harvest index (41.25%) were found maximum at 125% RDNK level of fertigation in 5 splits than lower fertigation levels (75 and 100 per cent) and over conventional soil application of 100 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index of rice was significantly highest, 41.25%, at 125% RDNK fertigation in 5 splits compared with lower fertigation levels and conventional soil application of 100% RDF.

Treatment
125% RDNK level of fertigation in 5 splitse1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
41.25%e1
Qualifier
lower fertigation levels (75 and 100 per cent)e1
Comparator
conventional soil application of 100 per cent RDFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly maximum grain yield of rice (5103 kgha-1), straw yield (7268 kgha-1) and harvest index (41.25%) were found maximum at 125% RDNK level of fertigation in 5 splits than lower fertigation levels (75 and 100 per cent) and over conventional soil application of 100 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient use efficiency was better with the lower drip fertigation level of 75% of the recommended N and K dose than with conventional soil application of fertilizers.

Treatment
lower drip fertigation level of75 per cent recommended dose of N and K per hae1
Outcome
Nutrient use efficiencye1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
conventional soil application of fertilizerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nutrient use efficiency (NUE) was found better in lower drip fertigation level of75 per cent recommended dose of N and K per ha as compared to conventional soil application of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among herbicide treatments, a directed spray of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl followed by Bispyribac sodium at 25 DAS gave the maximum rice grain yield, 5231 kg/ha.

Treatment
directed spray of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl @ 0.615 a.i. kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium @ 0.025 a.i kgha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
rice grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
5231 kgha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“directed spray of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl @ 0.615 a.i. kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium @ 0.025 a.i kgha-1 at 25 DAS resulted in maximum rice grain yield (5231 kgha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same herbicide sequence also gave the maximum total nutrient uptake by the crop and water use efficiency in rice.

Treatment
directed spray of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl @ 0.615 a.i. kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium @ 0.025 a.i kgha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
total nutrient uptake by crop and water use efficiencye1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“directed spray of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl @ 0.615 a.i. kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium @ 0.025 a.i kgha-1 at 25 DAS resulted in maximum rice grain yield (5231 kgha-1) and also total nutrient uptake by crop and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125% RDNK in 5 splits recorded the maximum gross monetary returns, 120353 rupees per ha, in rice.

Treatment
125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splitse1
Outcome
Gross Monetary returnse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
₹120353 ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splits recorded maximum Gross Monetary returns (₹120353 ha-1), Net Monetary Returns (₹72924) and B:C ratio (2.54), nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125% RDNK in 5 splits recorded the maximum net monetary returns, 72924 rupees, in rice.

Treatment
125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splitse1
Outcome
Net Monetary Returnse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
₹72924e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splits recorded maximum Gross Monetary returns (₹120353 ha-1), Net Monetary Returns (₹72924) and B:C ratio (2.54), nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125% RDNK in 5 splits recorded the maximum benefit:cost ratio, 2.54, in rice.

Treatment
125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splitse1
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.54e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splits recorded maximum Gross Monetary returns (₹120353 ha-1), Net Monetary Returns (₹72924) and B:C ratio (2.54), nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 125% RDNK in 5 splits recorded the maximum nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency in rice.

Treatment
125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splitse1
Outcome
nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiencye1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 125% RDNK through drip fertigation in 5 splits recorded maximum Gross Monetary returns (₹120353 ha-1), Net Monetary Returns (₹72924) and B:C ratio (2.54), nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl followed by Bispyribac sodium treatment registered the maximum gross monetary returns, 128755 rupees per ha, among herbicide treatments in rice.

Treatment
Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl0.615 kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium 0.025 kgha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
GMRe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
₹128755 ha-1e1
Comparator
all herbicidal treatmentse1

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The herbicidal treatment of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl0.615 kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium 0.025 kgha-1 at 25 DAS registered maximum GMR (₹128755 ha-1), NMR (₹81412ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.72) among all herbicidal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl followed by Bispyribac sodium treatment registered the maximum net monetary returns, 81412 rupees per ha, among herbicide treatments in rice.

Treatment
Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl0.615 kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium 0.025 kgha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
NMRe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
₹81412ha-1e1
Comparator
all herbicidal treatmentse1

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The herbicidal treatment of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl0.615 kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium 0.025 kgha-1 at 25 DAS registered maximum GMR (₹128755 ha-1), NMR (₹81412ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.72) among all herbicidal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl followed by Bispyribac sodium treatment registered the maximum benefit:cost ratio, 2.72, among herbicide treatments in rice.

Treatment
Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl0.615 kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium 0.025 kgha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.72e1
Comparator
all herbicidal treatmentse1

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The herbicidal treatment of Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl0.615 kgha-1 PE fb. Bispyribac sodium 0.025 kgha-1 at 25 DAS registered maximum GMR (₹128755 ha-1), NMR (₹81412ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.72) among all herbicidal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that herbicides are feasible for effective weed management in rice and for enhancing nutrient and water use efficiency.

Outcome
feasibility of using herbicides for effective weed managemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“indicating the feasibility of using herbicides for effective weed management in rice and for enhancing NUE and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1341 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

bispyribac-sodium · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

170 papers: 161 positive, 9 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

166 papers more in this group

See all 170 papers →

bispyribac-sodium · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Pyrazosulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 73 positive, 4 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Pyrazosulfuron ethyl gave higher boro rice grain yield than the other herbicide treatments.

    COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF HERBICIDES IN WEED CONTROL AND ENHANCEMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY OF RICE · 2017 · compared with chlorimuron + metsulfuron-methyl, bensulfuron methyl + pretilachlor, butachlor fb 2,4D, butachlor and cono-weeder

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

potassium · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 57 positive, 5 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.