Paper · 2004 · 土壤圈(英文版)

Nutrient Uptake and Use Efficiency of Irrigated Rice in Response to Potassium Application

Hong Hu

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Potassium is one of the most important nutrients for rice production in many areas of Asia, especially in southeast China where potassium deficiency in soil is a widespread problem. Field experiments were conducted for four consecutive years in Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, to determine utilization of nutrients (N, P and K) by inbred and hybrid rice and rice grain yields as affected by application of potassium fertilizer under irrigated conditions. Grain yield and nutrient harvest index showed a significant response to the NPK treatment as compared to the NP treatment. This suggested that potassium improved transfer of nitrogen and phosphorus from stems and leaves to panicles in rice plants. N and P use efficiencies of rice were not strongly responsive to potassium, but K use efficiency decreased significantly despite the fact that the amount of total K uptake increased. A significant difference between varieties was also observed with respect to nutrient uptake and use efficiency. Hybrid rice exhibited physiological advantage in N and P uptake and use efficiency over inbred rice. Analysis of annual dynamic change of exchangeable K and non-exchangeable K in the test soil indicated that non-exchangeable K was an important K source for rice. Potassium application caused an annual decrease in the concentration of available K in the soil tested, whereas an increase was observed in non-exchangeable K. It could be concluded that K fertilizer application at the rate of 100 kg ha-1 per season was not high enough to match K output, and efficient K management for rice must be based on the K input/output balance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK significantly affected rice grain yield relative to NP.

Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Comparator
NP treatmente0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and nutrient harvest index showed a significant response to the NPK treatment as compared to the NP treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK significantly affected nutrient harvest index relative to NP.

Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
nutrient harvest indexe0
Comparator
NP treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and nutrient harvest index showed a significant response to the NPK treatment as compared to the NP treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium was inferred to improve transfer of N and P from vegetative tissue to panicles.

Treatment
potassiume0
Outcome
transfer of nitrogen and phosphorus from stems and leaves to paniclese0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This suggested that potassium improved transfer of nitrogen and phosphorus from stems and leaves to panicles in rice plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice N and P use efficiencies did not respond strongly to potassium.

Treatment
potassiume0
Outcome
N and P use efficienciese0
Direction
not strongly responsivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N and P use efficiencies of rice were not strongly responsive to potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice K use efficiency decreased significantly with potassium application.

Treatment
Potassium Applicationt0
Outcome
K use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K use efficiency decreased significantly despite the fact that the amount of total K uptake increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice in Response to Potassium Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total K uptake increased.

Outcome
total K uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of total K uptake increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties differed significantly in nutrient uptake and use efficiency.

Material
varietiese0
Outcome
nutrient uptake and use efficiencye0
Direction
differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant difference between varieties was also observed with respect to nutrient uptake and use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid rice had superior N and P uptake and use efficiency to inbred rice.

Material
Hybrid ricee0
Outcome
N and P uptake and use efficiencye0
Direction
advantagee0
Comparator
inbred ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid rice exhibited physiological advantage in N and P uptake and use efficiency over inbred rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1099 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-exchangeable soil K was identified as an important source for rice.

Outcome
important K source for ricee0
Qualifier
non-exchangeable Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-exchangeable K was an important K source for rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application caused annual decline in available soil K.

Treatment
Potassium applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of available K in the soil testede0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium application caused an annual decrease in the concentration of available K in the soil tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application increased non-exchangeable soil K.

Treatment
Potassium Applicationt0
Outcome
non-exchangeable Ke0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas an increase was observed in non-exchangeable K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice in Response to Potassium Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 100 kg ha-1 K per season was insufficient to match K output.

Treatment
K fertilizer application at the rate of 100 kg ha-1 per seasone0
Outcome
not high enough to match K outpute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K fertilizer application at the rate of 100 kg ha-1 per season was not high enough to match K output”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Efficient rice K management should use a K input/output balance.

Outcome
K management for rice must be based on the K input/output balancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficient K management for rice must be based on the K input/output balance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1631 · show in text ↑

potassium · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

potassium · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.