Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The remaining flood treatments gave pod fresh weights 73% or less of the control.

A claim from Flooding Influences on Growth and Development of Bush Bean Under Greenhouse Conditions · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining flood treatments gave pod fresh weights 73% or less of the control.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
remaining flood treatmentse0
Outcome
pod fresh weightse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
73% or lesse0
Comparator
control weighte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58
e0

“The remaining flood treatments resulted in pod fresh weights 73% or less than the control weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–962

Title

Flooding Influences on Growth and Development of Bush Bean Under Greenhouse Conditions

Stewart T. Reed; Florence R. D'Ambrosio; Yuncong Li; et al. Journal of Vegetable Science 2005. doi:10.1300/j484v11n02_05

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-9281cd74e67634ad1912379c74feac0719f69aa197350127605bce1a04a0dd9b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

flooding · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 1 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.