Paper · 2005 · Journal of Vegetable Science

Flooding Influences on Growth and Development of Bush Bean Under Greenhouse Conditions

Stewart T. Reed; Florence R. D'Ambrosio; Yuncong Li; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Crop production in humid climates is often limited by severe thunderstorms that may leave soil flooded or waterlogged for several days. In 2001, a greenhouse study was initiated to determine the tolerance of bush beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to flooding of various durations and at different growth stages. Plants were subjected to eleven flooding treatments lasting from one to eleven days. Flood treatments were initiated when plants reached either early vegetative growth stage (second true leaf open), early reproductive stage (first flower open on the main stem) or late reproductive stage (green seeds fills 1/2 of the pod cavity). In Study 1 flooding during the early vegetative growth stage for one, two and five days resulted in both the number of pods produced and pod fresh weight being statistically similar to that of the non-flooded control. The remaining flood treatments resulted in pod fresh weights 73% or less than the control weight. The number of surviving plants had more influence on the pod fresh weight than did flood duration. The number of pods produced per plant was correlated to pod fresh weight (r2 = 0.90). Only one plant grown to either the early or late reproductive growth stage survived flooding for >24 h. There was a 21% yield reduction for plants flooded for 24 h during the early reproductive growth stage. Flooding for 24 h at the late reproductive stage resulted in a 50% yield reduction. In Study 2 plants flooded during early vegetative growth stage did not flower. Flooding during the late vegetative and flowering growth stages caused a 70% and 49% reduction in yield, respectively. Pod production slowed with increasing flood duration. Yield could be correlated to several plant physical characteristics. We found linear relationships between yield components (pod number and weight) and flood duration, flood timing and leaf area. Greenhouse data indicate that yield reduction can be estimated from changes in plant characteristics resulting from flooding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early vegetative flooding for one, two or five days left pod number and pod fresh weight statistically similar to the non-flooded control.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
flooding during the early vegetative growth stage for one, two and five dayse0
Outcome
number of pods produced and pod fresh weighte0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
non-flooded controle0
Setting
greenhousee1

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“In Study 1 flooding during the early vegetative growth stage for one, two and five days resulted in both the number of pods produced and pod fresh weight being statistically similar to that of the non-flooded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2001, a greenhouse study was initiated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining flood treatments gave pod fresh weights 73% or less of the control.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
remaining flood treatmentse0
Outcome
pod fresh weightse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
73% or lesse0
Comparator
control weighte0

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“The remaining flood treatments resulted in pod fresh weights 73% or less than the control weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–962 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods per plant was correlated with pod fresh weight (r2 = 0.90).

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
number of pods produced per plante0
Outcome
pod fresh weighte0
Value
r2 = 0.90e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of pods produced per plant was correlated to pod fresh weight (r2 = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one plant grown to the early or late reproductive stage survived flooding longer than 24 h.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Organ / stage
early or late reproductive growth stagee0
Outcome
survived flooding for >24 he0

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only one plant grown to either the early or late reproductive growth stage survived flooding for >24 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding for 24 h at the early reproductive stage reduced yield by 21%.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
flooded for 24 h during the early reproductive growth stagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was a 21% yield reduction for plants flooded for 24 h during the early reproductive growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding for 24 h at the late reproductive stage reduced yield by 50%.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
Flooding for 24 h at the late reproductive stagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flooding for 24 h at the late reproductive stage resulted in a 50% yield reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1439 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Study 2, plants flooded during early vegetative growth did not flower.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Outcome
did not flowere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants flooded during early vegetative growth stage did not flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding during the late vegetative stage reduced yield by 70%.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
Flooding during the late vegetativee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flooding during the late vegetative and flowering growth stages caused a 70% and 49% reduction in yield, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding during the flowering stage reduced yield by 49%.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
flowering growth stagese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flooding during the late vegetative and flowering growth stages caused a 70% and 49% reduction in yield, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod production slowed with increasing flood duration.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
increasing flood duratione0
Outcome
Pod productione0
Direction
slowede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pod production slowed with increasing flood duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1691 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components (pod number and weight) showed linear relationships with flood duration, flood timing and leaf area.

Taxon
Bush Beant0
Treatment
flood duration, flood timing and leaf areae0
Outcome
yield components (pod number and weight)e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“We found linear relationships between yield components (pod number and weight) and flood duration, flood timing and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1887 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 1 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

stage · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 14 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

flooding · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.