Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc priming increased nearly all physiological and yield parameters.

A claim from Role of Seed Priming with Zinc in Improving the Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc priming increased nearly all physiological and yield parameters.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
priming techniques of zince0
Outcome
physiological and yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming techniques of zinc gave higher values in almost all the physiological and yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1066
t0

“Hybrid Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–60

Title

Role of Seed Priming with Zinc in Improving the Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield

Sher Afzal; Nadeem Akbar; Zahoor Ahmad; et al. 2013

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-93b74addcbcc4f198a381a7d331bc1d1413788224ba8a19f31e3173beaacab9a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this claim · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

432 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

156 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.