Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Farmyard manure gave cabbage with lower total N, nitrate and oxalic acid contents than mineral fertilisers.

A claim from Influence of different nitrogen sources and levels on ion content of cabbage ( Brassica oleracea var. capitate ) · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure gave cabbage with lower total N, nitrate and oxalic acid contents than mineral fertilisers.

Treatment
farmyard manuree2
Outcome
total N, nitrate, and oxalic acid contentse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
mineral fertiliserse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“farmyard manure was much more suitable than mineral fertilisers for plant quality according to lower total N, nitrate, and oxalic acid contents of cabbage plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2528–2689
t0

“ion content of cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76

Title

Influence of different nitrogen sources and levels on ion content of cabbage ( Brassica oleracea var. capitate )

Metin Turan; Figen Sevimli New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2005. doi:10.1080/01140671.2005.9514356

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-9601d5cc85a3559ea133cb08a6f894ba5feadfd62caa83ff5581b3784c92dacf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.