Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treated wheat yielded more than untreated plants after recovery.

A claim from Physiological response of dwarf wheat to chlorocholinechloride under soil moisture stress · 1978

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wheat yielded more than untreated plants after recovery.

Treatment
Spraying of CCC (500 ppm)e1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
after recovery from moisture stresse0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated plants after recovery from moisture stress yield even more than the untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–330
e1

“Spraying of CCC (500 ppm) on wheat cv. Kalyan Sona-227”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54

Title

Physiological response of dwarf wheat to chlorocholinechloride under soil moisture stress

K. S. Gill; O. S. Singh Biologia Plantarum 1978. doi:10.1007/bf02923344

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-962279dc1e51753698aa18d291274d7b829ffb437d7b259ca2eef4373955618f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    CCC sprayed at jointing increased wheat grain yield.

    A comparative study of two methods of applying CCC ((2-chloroethyl) trimethylommonium chloride) to wheat · 1971

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Chlormequat and paclobutrazol did not affect wheat grain yield.

    Use of growth retardants in wheat · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    CCC did not affect yield.

    Response of Five Winter Wheat Cultivars to Growth Regulators and Increased Nitrogen1 · 1986

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Chlormequat left seed yields unchanged.

    EFFECTS OF CHLORMEQUAT ON PLANT HEIGHT, DISEASE DEVELOPMENT AND CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF CULTIVARS OF BARLEY, OATS, AND WHEAT · 1977

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    CCC applied at ZGS 31-32 reduced wheat grain yield by 480 kg ha-1.

    Timing applications of growth regulators to alter spring cereal development at high latitudes · 2002

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    In the nonlodging year, CCC yield was similar to the check, at 6.60 versus 6.39 Mg ha −1.

    Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat as Influenced by Chlormequat Chloride and Ethephon · 1989 · compared with check

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Chlormequat did not significantly affect shoot number, crop dry weight, or grain yield in either cereal.

    A comparison of the root and shoot growth of winter barley and winter wheat, and the effect of an early application of chlormequat · 1984

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    On average the dwarfing compound CCC had no effect on spring wheat grain yields.

    Woburn irrigation, 1960–8:VI. Results for rotation crops · 1970

    Opposite direction

62 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    CCC sprayed at jointing increased wheat grain yield.

    A comparative study of two methods of applying CCC ((2-chloroethyl) trimethylommonium chloride) to wheat · 1971

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Foliar N applications showed no consistent increase or decrease in grain yield, straw yield or straw N.

    Influence of Late‐Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Yield and Grain Nitrogen in Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Boot-stage foliar N significantly reduced grain yield of hard red spring wheat by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    soil application of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect wheat dry matter yield.

    Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    One and two fungicide sprays did not differ significantly in increasing wheat grain yield.

    Reduction of Winter Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Stripe Rust through Fungicide Management · 2016 · compared with One

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Boot stage foliar nitrogen reduced spring wheat grain yield by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nano-N plus nano-Zn with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.