Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Propanil alone at 3.3 kg/ha did not control propanil-resistant barnyardgrass in rice at the two-leaf stage or when repeated at the four-leaf stage.

A claim from Control of Propanil-Resistant Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Rice (Oryza sativa) with Carbaryl/Propanil Mixtures · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propanil alone at 3.3 kg/ha did not control propanil-resistant barnyardgrass in rice at the two-leaf stage or when repeated at the four-leaf stage.

Treatment
Propanil alone at 3.3 kg ai/hae1
Interactor
propanil-resistant barnyardgrasse1weed
Outcome
propanil-resistant barnyardgrasse1
Direction
did not controle1
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–91
e0

“were evaluated in field experiments for control of propanil-resistant and -susceptible barnyardgrass in 1995 and 1996 in Arkansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–332
e1

“Propanil alone at 3.3 kg ai/ha did not control propanil-resistant barnyardgrass when applied to two-leaf and repeated at four-leaf barnyardgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–478

Title

Control of Propanil-Resistant Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Rice (Oryza sativa) with Carbaryl/Propanil Mixtures

Hassane Daou; Ronald E. Talbert Weed Technology 1999. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00044924

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-967aaab616a767a8ffca0e0171f0a520e0d223555ecf1e3ba7e325886131231d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

propanil · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.