Claim · model-written summary
2-Butyne-1,4-diol had no effect on picloram ester phytotoxicity.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavae1 - Treatment
- 2‐Butyne‐1,4‐diole0
- Outcome
- phytotoxicity of picloram estere0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2‐Butyne‐1,4‐diol had no effect on the phytotoxicity of picloram ester.”
e1“guava plants grown in a glasshouse”
Title
D. J. Turner; M. C. P. Loader Pesticide Science 1971. doi:10.1002/ps.2780020203
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Picloram and DEF mixtures caused more severe effects at nine months than either alone in poplar and privet.
- Observation Earlier DEF synergy with triethylamine 2,4,5-T on privet diminished or disappeared.
- Intervention effect DEF mixed with 2,4,5-T iso-octyl ester had antagonistic short and longer term phytotoxic effects.
- Intervention effect DEF synergized with salt or amine formulations of picloram, 2,4,5-T or mecoprop in guava.
- Intervention effect DEF antagonized ester formulations of the herbicides in guava.
- Intervention effect Xylene did not appreciably increase picloram effects when a wetting agent was present.
- Intervention effect Triton B 1956 did not appreciably increase picloram effects when a wetting agent was present.
- Intervention effect DEF and picloram synergy was reduced when DEF was applied to guava leaves 2–4 hours before or after picloram.
- Intervention effect DEF and picloram did not interact when introduced into guava vascular tissue.