Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined GAJ, urea, and potassium sulphate promoted grapevine growth parameters.

A claim from BUD FERTILITY, GROWTH, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF THOMPSON SEEDLESS GRAPEVINE AS AFFECTED BY SOME FIELD PRACTICES · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined GAJ, urea, and potassium sulphate promoted grapevine growth parameters.

Taxon
GRAPEVINEVitist0
Treatment
GAJ, urea and potassium sulphate togethere0
Outcome
Growth parameterse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth parameters were greaUy promoted by GAJ, urea and potassium sulphate together.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–429
t0

“GRAPEVINE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77

Title

BUD FERTILITY, GROWTH, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF THOMPSON SEEDLESS GRAPEVINE AS AFFECTED BY SOME FIELD PRACTICES

M. Elmogy,; M. Shoaab; H. Abd Ella Journal of Plant Production 2004. doi:10.21608/jpp.2004.238587

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-97a95ce77bc8eb39ae79c0390a9be9b98a70a75110ebfbfe66b31f14749e462b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

potassium sulfate · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.