Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PBZ advanced fruit harvest by 15 days in Amrapali pruned to 50% of previous season growth.

A claim from Responses of pruning and paclobutrazol in mango (Mangifera indica L.): changes in tree vigour, flowering and phenols · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBZ advanced fruit harvest by 15 days in Amrapali pruned to 50% of previous season growth.

Material
Amrapalie3
Treatment
PBZ applicatione3
Outcome
advanced fruit harveste3
Direction
advancede3
Value
15e3
Qualifier
trees pruned to 50% previous season growthe3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning after fruit harvest and use of paclobutrazol (PBZ) have been identified as common strategies for tree vigour regulation and productivity enhancement in mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–302
e3

“Early flowering witnessed as a result of PBZ application led to advanced fruit harvest by 20.4, 13.0 and 14.7 days in trees pruned to 50% of current season growth and 18.7, 13.7 and 15 days in trees pruned to 50% previous season growth in the cvs Raspuri, Dashehari and Amrapali, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1099

Title

Responses of pruning and paclobutrazol in mango (Mangifera indica L.): changes in tree vigour, flowering and phenols

V. Srilatha; Y.T.N. Reddy; K.K. Upreti; et al. Journal of Applied Horticulture 2016. doi:10.37855/jah.2016.v18i02.26

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-97ac4f007b88d2d2175a639368eef206e935c1c0e69c7339a5159134da132023 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

paclobutrazol · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.