Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropped soybean had decreased harvest index and conversion efficiency.

A claim from Leaf, plant, to canopy: A mechanistic study on aboveground plasticity and plant density within a maize–soybean intercrop system for the Midwest, USA · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped soybean had decreased harvest index and conversion efficiency.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Intercroppede0
Outcome
HI and ɛ ce0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropped soybean invested in both plasticity responses, which maintained ɛ i , but HI and ɛ c decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1020

Title

Leaf, plant, to canopy: A mechanistic study on aboveground plasticity and plant density within a maize–soybean intercrop system for the Midwest, USA

Elena A. Pelech; Jochem B. Evers; Taylor L. Pederson; et al. Plant Cell & Environment 2022. doi:10.1111/pce.14487

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-99a0db13badecbceb4515d1834fea50538e2f79b6b7dbd877841ebb6d05098f7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Intercropped soybean had lower leaf area, biomass and yield than sole soybean.

    Plant architectural responses in simultaneous maize/soybean strip intercropping do not lead to a yield advantage · 2020 · compared with sole soybean plants

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Yield and land equivalent ratio of both intercrops increased over sole crops

    Interspecific Interaction and Nutrient Use in Soybean/Sorghum Intercropping System · 2006 · compared with sole crops

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Soybean had higher grain yield after intercropping than after monocropped corn.

    Improving Soil Fertility and Crop Yield in a Tropical Region with Palisadegrass Cover Crops · 2015 · compared with monocropped areas

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Total monetary return was higher for the intercrops than for the sole crops.

    Effect of maize planting density on the performance of maize/soybean intercropping system in a guinea savannah agroecosystem · 2007 · compared with sole crops

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    soybean/potato intercropping showed significant yield advantage.

    Temporal Differentiation of Crop Growth as One of the Drivers of Intercropping Yield Advantage · 2018 · compared with corresponding monocultures

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Soybean grain yield was higher after sole and intercropped ruzi grass than after other crops.

    Legumes and forage species sole or intercropped with corn in soybean-corn succession in midwestern Brazil · 2013 · compared with other crops

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Sunflower and soybean intercrops gave LER values higher than 1 in both experiments, so intercrops were more productive than sole crops.

    Intercropping sunflower and soybean in intensive farming systems: Evaluating yield advantage and effect on weed and insect assemblages · 2014 · compared with sole crops

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Grass and legume intercropping positively affected soybean grain yield.

    Soil quality and soybean productivity in crop-livestock integrated system in no-tillage · 2018

    Opposite direction

209 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.