Claim · model-written summary
Normal wood had a greater fibre diameter (37 µm) than tension wood.
- Taxon
- Terminalia superba
Terminalia superbae0 - Outcome
- diametere3
- Direction
- greatere3
- Value
- 37 µme3
- Comparator
- tension woode3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study ascertained the physico-mechanical and anatomical properties of Terminalia superba tension wood, in comparison with its normal counterpart”
e3“The double wall thickness (66 µm) and diameter (37 µm) of normal wood were greater than those of tension wood (65.68 and 33.24 µm, respectively)”
Title
C. Antwi-Boasiako; E.S. Ofosu; M. Glalah Wood Material Science and Engineering 2024. doi:10.1080/17480272.2024.2337149
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Tension wood had higher green moisture content (75 ± 2%) than normal wood.
- Observation Tension wood had lower basic density (562 ± 11 kg/m3) than normal wood.
- Observation Normal wood had a greater modulus of elasticity (11293 ± 227.5) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had a greater modulus of rupture (106 ± 4.5) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had greater compression parallel to grain (65 ± 1.8) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had a greater double wall thickness (66 µm) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had greater fibre length (1.4 mm) than tension wood.
- Observation Tension wood had wider fibre-lumen diameter (32.24 µm) than normal wood.
- Observation Tension wood had wider vessel diameter (156.80 µm) than normal wood.
- Recommendation Tension wood would substitute for normal wood in light construction works.