Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two copper sprays produced a dry fodder yield of 95.8 q ha−1.

A claim from Fodder quality improvement and enrichment of oats with Cu through biofortification: a technique to reduce animal malnutrition · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two copper sprays produced a dry fodder yield of 95.8 q ha−1.

Treatment
two foliar application of Cu @ 0.2% sprayed at 60 and 90 days of sowinge0
Outcome
dry fodder yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
95.8 q ha−1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two foliar application of Cu @ 0.2% sprayed at 60 and 90 days of sowing effected oats growth which recorded maximum enrichment of Cu, green fodder yield (405 q ha−1), dry fodder yield (95.8 q ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–765

Title

Fodder quality improvement and enrichment of oats with Cu through biofortification: a technique to reduce animal malnutrition

Amandeep Sandhu; S. S. Dhaliwal; A. K. Shukla; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1739291

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-9b6abd7a46a2cc784bf50e8bcb3e8669407f829a92143b1acd19cb26e1d86e7b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

copper atom · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 29 positive, 5 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.