Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reduced stomatal conductance due to larger amplitude cycling of CO2 during growth occurred in soybeans and rice.

A claim from Normal Cyclic Variation in CO2 Concentration in Indoor Chambers Decreases Leaf Gas Exchange and Plant Growth · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced stomatal conductance due to larger amplitude cycling of CO2 during growth occurred in soybeans and rice.

Taxon
soybeans and riceGlycine maxOryza sativae0
Treatment
larger amplitude cycling of CO2e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
Reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced stomatal conductance due to larger amplitude cycling of CO2 during growth occurred even in soybeans and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1489

Title

Normal Cyclic Variation in CO2 Concentration in Indoor Chambers Decreases Leaf Gas Exchange and Plant Growth

James Bunce Plants 2020. doi:10.3390/plants9050663

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-9cf3e33e4ec42e6664a7b14242fdc63e5eb664369e3b473a8766daba696d3a8a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.