Paper · 2020 · Plants

Normal Cyclic Variation in CO2 Concentration in Indoor Chambers Decreases Leaf Gas Exchange and Plant Growth

James Bunce

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Attempts to identify crop genetic material with larger growth stimulation at projected elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations are becoming more common. The probability of reductions in photosynthesis and yield caused by short-term variation in CO2 concentration within elevated CO2 treatments in the free-air CO2 enrichment plots raises the question of whether similar effects occur in glasshouse or indoor chamber experiments. These experiments were designed to test whether even the normal, modest, cyclic variation in CO2 concentration typical of indoor exposure systems have persistent impacts on photosynthesis and growth, and to explore mechanisms underlying the responses observed. Wheat, cotton, soybeans, and rice were grown from seed in indoor chambers at a mean CO2 concentration of 560 μmol mol−1, with “triangular” cyclic variation with standard deviations of either 4.5 or 18.0 μmol mol−1 measured with 0.1 s sampling periods with an open path analyzer. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and above ground biomass at 20 to 23 days were reduced in all four species by the larger variation in CO2 concentration. Tests of rates of stomatal opening and closing with step changes in light and CO2, and tests of responses to square-wave cycling of CO2 were also conducted on individual leaves of these and three other species, using a leaf gas exchange system. Reduced stomatal conductance due to larger amplitude cycling of CO2 during growth occurred even in soybeans and rice, which had equal rates of opening and closing in response to step changes in CO2. The gas exchange results further indicated that reduced mean stomatal conductance was not the only cause of reduced photosynthesis in variable CO2 conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger cyclic variation in CO2 concentration reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and above ground biomass at 20 to 23 days in wheat, cotton, soybeans and rice grown in indoor chambers.

Treatment
the larger variation in CO2 concentratione1
Outcome
Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and above ground biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
at 20 to 23 dayse1
Setting
indoor chamberse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, cotton, soybeans, and rice were grown from seed in indoor chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–763 · show in text ↑
e1

“Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and above ground biomass at 20 to 23 days were reduced in all four species by the larger variation in CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced stomatal conductance due to larger amplitude cycling of CO2 during growth occurred in soybeans and rice.

Taxon
soybeans and riceGlycine maxOryza sativae0
Treatment
larger amplitude cycling of CO2e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
Reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced stomatal conductance due to larger amplitude cycling of CO2 during growth occurred even in soybeans and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1489 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybeans and rice had equal rates of stomatal opening and closing in response to step changes in CO2.

Taxon
soybeans and riceGlycine maxOryza sativae0
Outcome
equal rates of opening and closinge0
Qualifier
in response to step changes in CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybeans and rice, which had equal rates of opening and closing in response to step changes in CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1570 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gas exchange results indicated that reduced mean stomatal conductance was not the only cause of reduced photosynthesis in variable CO2 conditions.

Treatment
variable CO2 conditionse0
Outcome
reduced photosynthesise0
Qualifier
reduced mean stomatal conductance was not the only causee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The gas exchange results further indicated that reduced mean stomatal conductance was not the only cause of reduced photosynthesis in variable CO2 conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1729 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

64 papers: 50 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.