Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut+pigeonpea gave higher pigeonpea sud yield, 1.93 t/ha

A claim from Conservation agriculture practices improves productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)-based cropping systems · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut+pigeonpea gave higher pigeonpea sud yield, 1.93 t/ha

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane3
Treatment
Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut-ZTW and peanut+pigeonpeae3
Outcome
sud yield of pigeonpeae3
Direction
highere3
Value
1.93 t/hae3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut-ZTW and peanut+pigeonpea recorded higher grain yield of wheat (2.91 t/ha) and sud yield of pigeonpea (1.93 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1038

Title

Conservation agriculture practices improves productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)-based cropping systems

N K JAIN; RAM A JAT; R S YADAV; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.56093/ijas.v91i1.110956

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-9d8a98a02a1cf91cfe4e0b0151bb7f1bca4ec6670c5ca721f454a81d372e5d26 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Green manuring in peanut+pigeonpea gave higher pigeonpea grain yield of 1.76 t ha −1.

    Productivity, Nutrient, and Soil Enzymes Influenced with Conservation Agriculture Practices in Peanut · 2018

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Grain yields were not increased with N fertilizer.

    Comparison of N2 Fixation and Yields in Cajanus cajan between Hydrogenase-Positive and Hydrogenase-Negative Rhizobia by In Situ Acetylene Reduction Assays and Direct 15N Partitioning · 1983

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Vermicompost and phosphocompost gave identical growth and yield outcomes.

    Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) varieties to organic manures and their influence on fertility and enzyme activity of soil · 2006 · compared with phosphoeompost

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Fertilizer treatments had no effect on green pod yield.

    Influence of Fertility Level on the Protein Content and Agronomic Characters of Pigeonpeas in an Oxisol · 1971

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Palm bunch ash and PK fertiliser application had no significant effect on pigeonpea grain yield.

    Productivity of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by palm bunch ash and NPK fertiliser application and their residual effects on maize yield · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Growth regulators and foliar fertilizer had no effect on pod set or final pod number.

    Influence of Nutrition and Bioregulators on Flower Retention, Pod Set and Yield on Pigeon Peas (Cajanus Cajan (L.) Huth) · 1981

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Organic fertilizer had no effect on Cajanus cajan productivity compared with the control

    Effect of Cow Dung as Organic Manure on the Productivity of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp (Pigeon pea) · 2020 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Increasing fertilizer did not significantly increase equivalent yield in pigeonpea plus urdbean.

    Production Potential and Economic Feasibility of Planting Pattern and Nutrient Management in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Based Intercropping System under Rainfed Condition · 2020

    Opposite direction

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.