Abstract
To assess the influence of conservation agriculture (CA) practices on productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) - based cropping systems, the present field experiment was conducted for five consecutive years (2011-12 to 2015-16) at Junagadh, Gujarat, India. The experiment, comprising 14 treatments, viz. sole peanut, peanut-Sesbania, peanut-green gram (GG), peanut-conventional tilled wheat (CTW), peanut-CTW-Sesbania, peanut- CTW-GG, peanut-CTW-wheat straw incorporation (WSI), peanut-zero tilled wheat (ZTW), peanut-ZTW-Sesbania, peanut-ZTW-GG, peanut-ZTW-WSI, peanut+pigeonpea, peanut+pigeonpea-Sesbania and peanut+pigeonpea-GG was laid out in randomized block design with three replications at fixed site. Peanut -CTW-Sesbania cropping system (2.94 t/ha) recorded maximum pod yield of peanut while haulm yield was higher under peanut-ZTW-Sesbania (3.24 t/ha). Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut-ZTW and peanut+pigeonpea recorded higher grain yield of wheat (2.91 t/ha) and sud yield of pigeonpea (1.93 t/ha), respectively. System productivity (4.55 t/ha) was significantly higher under peanut-ZTW-Sesbania cropping system over sole peanut (with or without GM), peanut-CTW/ZTW, peanut- ZTW-WSI and peanut+pigeonpea (with or without GM). Peanut-ZTW-Sesbania also recorded maximum sustainable yield index (0.46) and sustainable value index (0.48) than other cropping systems. Thus, peanut followed by ZTW or CTW and GM was more productive and sustainable than sole peanut.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut -CTW-Sesbania cropping system gave the maximum peanut pod yield, 2.94 t/ha
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- Peanut -CTW-Sesbania cropping systeme1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 2.94 t/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) - based cropping systems”
e1“Peanut -CTW-Sesbania cropping system (2.94 t/ha) recorded maximum pod yield of peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut-ZTW-Sesbania gave higher peanut haulm yield, 3.24 t/ha
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- peanut-ZTW-Sesbaniae2
- Outcome
- haulm yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 3.24 t/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) - based cropping systems”
e2“haulm yield was higher under peanut-ZTW-Sesbania (3.24 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut-ZTW gave higher wheat grain yield, 2.91 t/ha
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume3 - Treatment
- Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut-ZTWe3
- Outcome
- grain yield of wheate3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 2.91 t/hae3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut-ZTW and peanut+pigeonpea recorded higher grain yield of wheat (2.91 t/ha) and sud yield of pigeonpea (1.93 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut+pigeonpea gave higher pigeonpea sud yield, 1.93 t/ha
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane3 - Treatment
- Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut-ZTW and peanut+pigeonpeae3
- Outcome
- sud yield of pigeonpeae3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 1.93 t/hae3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Green manuring with Sesbania in peanut-ZTW and peanut+pigeonpea recorded higher grain yield of wheat (2.91 t/ha) and sud yield of pigeonpea (1.93 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut-ZTW-Sesbania gave significantly higher system productivity than sole peanut, 4.55 t/ha
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- peanut-ZTW-Sesbania cropping systeme4
- Outcome
- System productivitye4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 4.55 t/hae4
- Comparator
- sole peanute4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) - based cropping systems”
e4“System productivity (4.55 t/ha) was significantly higher under peanut-ZTW-Sesbania cropping system over sole peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut-ZTW-Sesbania recorded the maximum sustainable yield index, 0.46
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Peanut-ZTW-Sesbaniae5
- Outcome
- sustainable yield indexe5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 0.46e5
- Comparator
- other cropping systemse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) - based cropping systems”
e5“Peanut-ZTW-Sesbania also recorded maximum sustainable yield index (0.46) and sustainable value index (0.48) than other cropping systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut-ZTW-Sesbania recorded the maximum sustainable value index, 0.48
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Peanut-ZTW-Sesbaniae5
- Outcome
- sustainable value indexe5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 0.48e5
- Comparator
- other cropping systemse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) - based cropping systems”
e5“Peanut-ZTW-Sesbania also recorded maximum sustainable yield index (0.46) and sustainable value index (0.48) than other cropping systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut followed by ZTW or CTW with green manure is more productive and sustainable than sole peanut
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- peanut followed by ZTW or CTW and GMe6
- Outcome
- productive and sustainablee6
- Direction
- moree6
- Comparator
- sole peanute6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on productivity and sustainability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) - based cropping systems”
e6“peanut followed by ZTW or CTW and GM was more productive and sustainable than sole peanut”
The same questions in other papers
Sesbania · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Sesbania · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →cultivation system · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.