Intervention effectmodel-written summary

sowing in FIRB with the weed-free plot yielded 0.63 kg/MJ for energy productivity.

A claim from Economic sustainability and energy efficiency of irrigated urdbean [Vigna mungo] under different sowing methods and weed management practices · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sowing in FIRB with the weed-free plot yielded 0.63 kg/MJ for energy productivity.

Taxon
urdbean (Vigna mungo)Vigna mungoe7
Treatment
sowing in FIRB with the weed-free plote0
Outcome
energy productivitye0
Value
0.63 kg/MJe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–233
e0

“The results indicated that sowing in Furrow Irrigated Raised Bed (FIRB) and weed management through pre-emergence application of herbicides, followed by mechanical weeding (baby weeder) at 20 days after sowing (DAS), produced the highest yields of 833 kg/ha and 850 kg/ha, respectively. In terms of energy productivity, sowing in FIRB with the weed-free plot achieved 0.63 kg/MJ, followed by the same method of planting with the pre-emergence application of herbicides followed by one-hand weeding at 20 DAS (0.57 kg/MJ). A similar trend was observed in energy use efficiency, with values of 9.22 and 8.35, respectively. Economically, urdbean sowing by seed drill and pre-emergence application of herbicides followed by mechanical weeding at 20 DAS resulted in the highest benefit-cost ratio of 2.01, followed by the sowing in FIRB with the pre-emergence application of herbicides followed by mechanical weeding at 20 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–1280

Title

Economic sustainability and energy efficiency of irrigated urdbean [Vigna mungo] under different sowing methods and weed management practices

F S Anitta; S Senthamizhselvan; M Raju; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.5500

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-9da0037a338e78ccd39173e83c2ecabaeef120db2f06dc60d6ec2b5464bde83c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 89 positive, 6 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.