Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fe-EDTA treatments increased wheat grain Fe relative to control, with soil plus foliar application reaching 86.54 ± 5.57 mg kg-1.

A claim from Enhancing iron concentration in bread wheat through Fe-EDTA fortification · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-EDTA treatments increased wheat grain Fe relative to control, with soil plus foliar application reaching 86.54 ± 5.57 mg kg-1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fe-EDTA treatmentse0
Outcome
amount of Fe in wheat grainse0
Direction
highere0
Value
86.54 ± 5.57 mg kg-1e0
Qualifier
Fe-EDTA was applied in soil + foliare0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43
e0

“The amount of Fe in wheat grains was significantly higher in all Fe-EDTA treatments over control, with maximum value (86.54 ± 5.57 mg kg-1) in the treatment where Fe-EDTA was applied in soil + foliar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1070

Title

Enhancing iron concentration in bread wheat through Fe-EDTA fortification

Saleem Maseeh BHATTİ; Zulfiqar Ali MARİ; Zohaib Ur Rehman BUGHİO; et al. EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS) 2023. doi:10.18393/ejss.1394446

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-9dc38eb299073bf92cf0d92bc67954c47115600371ea2a9842d4e14f5c621408 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
    Fe deficiency-induced Zn2+ uptake was more enhanced than absorption of Zn-phytosiderophore complexes in short-term uptake experiments in bread wheat.

    Iron deficiency‐induced zinc uptake by bread wheat · 2019 · compared with absorption of Zn‐phytosiderophore (PS) complexes

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  8. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.