Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Adding either surfactant increased the amount of spray injury from fungicides in apple scab control sprays.

A claim from Non-Ionic Surfactants in Concentrate Mixtures for the Control of Apple Scab1 · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding either surfactant increased the amount of spray injury from fungicides in apple scab control sprays.

Treatment
The addition of either surfactante0
Outcome
spray injury from fungicidese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control of Apple Scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75
e0

“The addition of either surfactant increased the amount of spray injury from fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–253

Title

Non-Ionic Surfactants in Concentrate Mixtures for the Control of Apple Scab1

J. E. Swales; K. Williams Canadian journal of agricultural science/Canadian Journal of Agricultural Science 2016

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-9de012e05c8dee39503ea837f736a1ec7542758a1b33e1f03eb4c79f80bf1eeb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

surfactant · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.