Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flood stress reduced rice yield at panicle differentiation.

A claim from Comprehensive metabolomic, proteomic and physiological analyses of grain yield reduction in rice under abrupt drought–flood alternation stress · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flood stress reduced rice yield at panicle differentiation.

Organ / stage
panicle differentiation stagee0
Treatment
floode0
Outcome
yield of ricee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought and flood stress caused a decrease in the yield of rice at the panicle differentiation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–578

Title

Comprehensive metabolomic, proteomic and physiological analyses of grain yield reduction in rice under abrupt drought–flood alternation stress

Qiang‐Qiang Xiong; Tian‐Hua Shen; Lei Zhong; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12901

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-9df2d4af3e1dfd405bdd686b84fecf0030a6a3369e18bf6a47fdca34378486f2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 193 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    AWD applied early in the season then flooded reduced yield-scaled GWP by 45%.

    Reducing greenhouse gas emissions, water use, and grain arsenic levels in rice systems · 2014 · compared with flooded control

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Swarna-Sub1 had a significant positive effect on rice yield when fields were submerged for 7 to 14 days.

    Flood-tolerant rice reduces yield variability and raises expected yield, differentially benefitting socially disadvantaged groups · 2013

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Continuous flooding produced significantly higher yield than aerobic and saturated conditions.

    Soil Texture and Cultivar Effects on Rice (Oryza sativa, L.) Grain Yield, Yield Components and Water Productivity in Three Water Regimes · 2016 · compared with aerobic and saturated soil conditions

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Flooding increased rice yield.

    Combined impacts of Si-rich rice residues and flooding extent on grain As and Cd in rice · 2019

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Flooded regimes increased grain yield relative to non-flooded regimes.

    Effects of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in paddy fields on rice growth and N, P, K nutrition under different water regimes · 1995 · compared with non-flooded conditions (NF and F-NF)

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Anaerobic seeding with flooding 3 DAS sustained high rice yield without reduction

    INCREASING WATER PRODUCTIVITY AND WEED SUPPRESSION OF WET SEEDED RICE: EFFECT OF WATER MANAGEMENT AND RICE GENOTYPES · 2000

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Prior submergence followed by drought raised rice dry matter production above well-watered counterparts.

    Dry Matter Production and Root System Development of Rice Cultivars under Fluctuating Soil Moisture · 2000 · compared with well-watered counterparts

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Continuous flooding had significantly higher rice grain weight than AWD, attributed to slower grain filling and high leaf N at the later stage of grain filling.

    Water Use Efficiency and Physiological Response of Rice Cultivars under Alternate Wetting and Drying Conditions · 2012 · compared with AWD

    Opposite direction

277 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.