Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T11 produced maximum grain yield of 1683 kg ha−1.

A claim from Effect of foliar nutrition supplement on productivity and profitability of medium duration pigeonpea · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 produced maximum grain yield of 1683 kg ha−1.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
NPK (19:19:19) @ 1% + Solubor (B20%) @ 0.2% spray at flower bud initiatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1683 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
T12e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain yield (1683 kg ha−1) was recorded with application of NPK (19:19:19) @ 1% + Solubor (B20%) @ 0.2% spray at flower bud initiation (T11) followed by T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1377
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100

Title

Effect of foliar nutrition supplement on productivity and profitability of medium duration pigeonpea

P.K. Panda; I.O.P Mishra; A.M. Prusti; et al. Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture 2022. doi:10.5958/2582-2683.2022.00046.6

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9df62080991973e5824d83ca6870efd58b03e20e0a53efb2bc45c0709b27caf5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.