Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In darkness, transpiration was 141% of moderate humidity plants.

A claim from Stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana grown at high relative air humidity · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness, transpiration was 141% of moderate humidity plants.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
141e0
Qualifier
in darknesse0
Comparator
moderate RHe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with plants grown at moderate RH the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and aperture of high RH grown plants measured at the same condition (40% RH) were, respectively, 112, 139 and 132% in light and 141, 188 and 370% in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–732
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60

Title

Stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana grown at high relative air humidity

Abdolhossein Rezaei Nejad; Uulke Van Meeteren Physiologia Plantarum 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00567.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-9dfb7d41bd0e4a2ebecb6bc247ec0a881646e2d73612bf8bd76427e3c252646e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

humidity · physiology: gas exchange · Tradescantia virginiana (Virginia spiderwort)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.