Paper · 2006 · Journal of Experimental Botany

The role of abscisic acid in disturbed stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana during growth at high relative air humidity

A. R. Nejad; U. van Meeteren

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
71
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In this study, the role of abscisic acid (ABA) in altered stomatal responses of Tradescantia virginiana leaves grown at high relative air humidity (RH) was investigated. A lower ABA concentration was found in leaves grown at high RH compared with leaves grown at moderate RH. As a result of a daily application of 20 microM ABA to leaves for 3 weeks during growth at high RH, the stomata of ABA-treated leaves grown at high RH showed the same behaviour as did the stomata of leaves grown at moderate RH. For example, they closed rapidly when exposed to desiccation. Providing a high RH around a single leaf of a plant during growth at moderate RH changed the stomatal responses of this leaf. The stomata in this leaf grown at high RH did not close completely in response to desiccation in contrast to the stomata of the other leaves from the same plant. The ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis, though not on a dry weight basis, of this leaf was significantly lower than that of the others. Moreover, less closure of stomata was found in the older leaves of plants grown at high RH in response to desiccation compared with younger leaves. This was correlated with a lower ABA concentration in these leaves on a fresh weight basis, though not on a dry weight basis. Stomata of leaves grown at moderate RH closed in response to short-term application of ABA or sodium nitroprusside (SNP), while for leaves grown at high RH there was a clear difference in stomatal responses between the leaf margins and main-vein areas. The stomatal aperture in response to short-term application of ABA or SNP at the leaf margins of leaves grown at high RH remained significantly wider than in the main-vein areas. It was concluded that: (i) a long-term low ABA concentration in well-watered plants during growth at high RH could be a reason for less or no stomatal closure under conditions of drought stress; and (ii) the long-term ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis rather than on a dry weight basis is likely to be responsible for structural or physiological changes in stomata during leaf growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves grown at high RH had lower ABA concentration than those grown at moderate RH.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
leaves grown at high RHe0
Outcome
ABA concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
leaves grown at moderate RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“A lower ABA concentration was found in leaves grown at high RH compared with leaves grown at moderate RH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily ABA application during high-RH growth restored stomatal behaviour resembling moderate-RH leaves.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
stomatae0
Treatment
daily application of 20 microM ABAe0
Outcome
stomata of ABA-treated leaves grown at high RH showed the same behavioure0
Direction
same behavioure0
Comparator
leaves grown at moderate RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“a daily application of 20 microM ABA to leaves for 3 weeks during growth at high RH, the stomata of ABA-treated leaves grown at high RH showed the same behaviour as did the stomata of leaves grown at moderate RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–502 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA-treated high-RH stomata closed rapidly under desiccation.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
desiccatione0
Outcome
closed rapidlye0
Direction
rapidlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“they closed rapidly when exposed to desiccation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single leaf grown at high RH did not fully close stomata under desiccation compared with other leaves on that plant.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
stomatae0
Direction
did not close completelye0
Comparator
other leaves from the same plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“The stomata in this leaf grown at high RH did not close completely in response to desiccation in contrast to the stomata of the other leaves from the same plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–853 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The high-RH single leaf had significantly lower fresh-weight ABA concentration than other leaves, but not lower dry-weight concentration.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Outcome
ABA concentration on a fresh weight basise0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
though not on a dry weight basise0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis, though not on a dry weight basis, of this leaf was significantly lower than that of the others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–996 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older high-RH leaves had less stomatal closure under desiccation than younger leaves.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
older leavese0
Outcome
closure of stomatae0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
younger leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“less closure of stomata was found in the older leaves of plants grown at high RH in response to desiccation compared with younger leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced closure in older high-RH leaves correlated with lower fresh-weight ABA concentration.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
these leavese0
Outcome
ABA concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
though not on a dry weight basise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was correlated with a lower ABA concentration in these leaves on a fresh weight basis, though not on a dry weight basis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate-RH stomata closed after short-term ABA application.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
leaves grown at moderate RHe0
Treatment
short-term application of ABAe0
Outcome
Stomatae0
Direction
closede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stomata of leaves grown at moderate RH closed in response to short-term application of ABA or sodium nitroprusside (SNP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate-RH stomata closed after short-term SNP application.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
leaves grown at moderate RHe0
Treatment
sodium nitroprusside (SNP)e0
Outcome
Stomatae0
Direction
closede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stomata of leaves grown at moderate RH closed in response to short-term application of ABA or sodium nitroprusside (SNP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After short-term ABA or SNP, high-RH leaf-margin stomatal apertures remained significantly wider than main-vein apertures.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
leaf marginse0
Treatment
short-term application of ABA or SNPe0
Outcome
stomatal aperturee0
Direction
widere0
Comparator
main-vein arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“The stomatal aperture in response to short-term application of ABA or SNP at the leaf margins of leaves grown at high RH remained significantly wider than in the main-vein areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1702 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer prolonged low ABA under high RH may explain limited stomatal closure during drought.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Compound
ABAe0
Outcome
less or no stomatal closuree0
Qualifier
could be a reasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“a long-term low ABA concentration in well-watered plants during growth at high RH could be a reason for less or no stomatal closure under conditions of drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1896 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer fresh-weight rather than dry-weight ABA concentration may drive stomatal changes during leaf growth.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Organ / stage
leaf growthe0
Compound
ABAe0
Outcome
structural or physiological changes in stomatae0
Qualifier
is likely to be responsiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“the long-term ABA concentration on a fresh weight basis rather than on a dry weight basis is likely to be responsible for structural or physiological changes in stomata during leaf growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–2094 · show in text ↑

humidity · physiology: gas exchange · Tradescantia virginiana (Virginia spiderwort)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.