Paper · 2005 · Physiologia Plantarum

Stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana grown at high relative air humidity

Abdolhossein Rezaei Nejad; Uulke Van Meeteren

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
85
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants produced at high relative air humidity (RH) show poor control of water loss after transferring to low RH, a phenomenon which is thought to be due to their stomatal behaviour. The stomatal anatomy and responses of moderate (55%) and high (90%) RH grown Tradescantia virginiana plants to treatments that normally induce stomatal closure, i.e. desiccation, abscisic acid (ABA) application and exposure to darkness were studied using attached or detached young, fully expanded leaves. Compared with plants grown at moderate RH the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and aperture of high RH grown plants measured at the same condition (40% RH) were, respectively, 112, 139 and 132% in light and 141, 188 and 370% in darkness. Besides the differences in stomatal size (guard cell length was 56.7 and 73.3 µm for moderate and high RH grown plants, respectively), there was a clear difference in stomatal behaviour. The stomata responded to desiccation, ABA and darkness in both moderate and high RH grown plants, but the high variability of stomatal closure in high RH grown plants was striking. Some stomata developed at high RH closed in response to darkness or to a decrease in relative water content to the same extent as did stomata from moderate RH grown plants, whereas others closed only partly or did not close at all. Evidently, some as yet unidentified physiological or anatomical changes during development disrupt the normal functioning of some stomata in leaves grown at high RH. The failure of some stomata to close fully in response to ABA suggests that ABA deficiency was not responsible for the lack of stomatal closure in response to desiccation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity grown plants had greater transpiration in light and darkness.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
112e0
Qualifier
in lighte0
Comparator
moderate RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with plants grown at moderate RH the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and aperture of high RH grown plants measured at the same condition (40% RH) were, respectively, 112, 139 and 132% in light and 141, 188 and 370% in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity grown plants had greater stomatal conductance in light.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
139e0
Qualifier
in lighte0
Comparator
moderate RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with plants grown at moderate RH the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and aperture of high RH grown plants measured at the same condition (40% RH) were, respectively, 112, 139 and 132% in light and 141, 188 and 370% in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity grown plants had greater stomatal aperture in light.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
aperturee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
132%e0
Qualifier
in lighte0
Comparator
moderate RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with plants grown at moderate RH the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and aperture of high RH grown plants measured at the same condition (40% RH) were, respectively, 112, 139 and 132% in light and 141, 188 and 370% in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness, transpiration was 141% of moderate humidity plants.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
141e0
Qualifier
in darknesse0
Comparator
moderate RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with plants grown at moderate RH the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and aperture of high RH grown plants measured at the same condition (40% RH) were, respectively, 112, 139 and 132% in light and 141, 188 and 370% in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness, stomatal conductance was 188% of moderate humidity plants.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
188e0
Qualifier
in darknesse0
Comparator
moderate RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with plants grown at moderate RH the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and aperture of high RH grown plants measured at the same condition (40% RH) were, respectively, 112, 139 and 132% in light and 141, 188 and 370% in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness, stomatal aperture was 370% of moderate humidity plants.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
aperturee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
370%e0
Qualifier
in darknesse0
Comparator
moderate RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with plants grown at moderate RH the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and aperture of high RH grown plants measured at the same condition (40% RH) were, respectively, 112, 139 and 132% in light and 141, 188 and 370% in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guard cells were longer in high humidity plants.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
guard cell lengthe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
73.3 µme0
Qualifier
56.7e0
Comparator
moderatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guard cell length was 56.7 and 73.3 µm for moderate and high RH grown plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomata responded to desiccation, ABA and darkness in both humidity groups.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Outcome
stomata responded to desiccation, ABA and darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stomata responded to desiccation, ABA and darkness in both moderate and high RH grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity plants varied markedly in stomatal closure.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
high variability of stomatal closuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the high variability of stomatal closure in high RH grown plants was striking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some high humidity stomata closed fully but others only partly or not at all.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
others closed only partly or did not close at alle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some stomata developed at high RH closed in response to darkness or to a decrease in relative water content to the same extent as did stomata from moderate RH grown plants, whereas others closed only partly or did not close at all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incomplete closure after ABA suggests ABA deficiency does not explain desiccation response.

Taxon
Tradescantia virginianaTradescantia virginianat0
Outcome
lack of stomatal closure in response to desiccatione0
Qualifier
ABA deficiency was not responsiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tradescantia virginiana
Tradescantia virginiana · TaxonDaniel J. Layton · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The failure of some stomata to close fully in response to ABA suggests that ABA deficiency was not responsible for the lack of stomatal closure in response to desiccation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tradescantia virginiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–60 · show in text ↑

humidity · physiology: gas exchange · Tradescantia virginiana (Virginia spiderwort)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.