Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Synthetic strigolactone GR24 rescued the ptox1 tillering phenotype.

A claim from The tillering phenotype of the rice plastid terminal oxidase (PTOX) loss‐of‐function mutant is associated with strigolactone deficiency · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic strigolactone GR24 rescued the ptox1 tillering phenotype.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativae1
Material
ptox1 mutante0
Treatment
application of the synthetic SL GR24e0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Direction
rescuede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tillering and semi-dwarf phenotypes of the ptox1 mutant are similar to phenotypes of known strigolactone (SL)-related rice mutants, and both phenotypic traits could be rescued by application of the synthetic SL GR24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–812
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa) PTOX1 gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–319

Title

The tillering phenotype of the rice plastid terminal oxidase (PTOX) loss‐of‐function mutant is associated with strigolactone deficiency

Muluneh Tamiru; Akira Abe; Hiroe Utsushi; et al. New Phytologist 2013. doi:10.1111/nph.12630

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-a0adfef54fb0d2c286922638e0e94dce72b42fb3e6f94b40b8a0e3bf149ece5d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

class · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 62 positive, 18 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.