Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sole 5 kg Zn per hectare significantly enhanced weight.

A claim from Response of Wheat to Farmyard Manure and Zinc Application in a Vertisol of Central India · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole 5 kg Zn per hectare significantly enhanced weight.

Treatment
5 kg Zn ha-1 sole applicatione0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
enhancementse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17
e0

“Significant enhancements in spike length (7.65 cm), weight and number of grains per spike (23.90), and DMP of 7.12 g pot-1 were recorded with the 5 kg Zn ha-1 sole application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1244

Title

Response of Wheat to Farmyard Manure and Zinc Application in a Vertisol of Central India

Megha Vishwakarma; G. S. Tagore; Indra Raj Yadav International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2023. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i244292

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-a37c85a459727c2711d738129e824535dcc066881ea2b59e25f38e7fde16a627 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

191 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.